Juniper Publishers - Remediation Potency of Charcoal Block and Sawdust in Petroleum Products Contaminated Soil
Trends in Technical & Scientific Research
Abstract
The
adsorption of Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) from petroleum products
contaminated soil using wood charcoal blocks and sawdust was investigated in this study. 130kg of
the sieved topsoil was contaminated with 5L of spent motor engine oil, 5L of
kerosene, 5L of petrol and 5L
of diesel, and left to stabilize for two weeks; after which it was thoroughly
mixed together. The thoroughly mixed soil was filled into plastic buckets (7kg per bucket) and arranged
in five rows. Row A contained the un-amended contaminated soil sample
(control), rows B and C
contained non-replacement amendments(s) (wood charcoal blocks and sawdust),
while rows D and E contained replacement amendment(s) which was/were replaced with fresh ones
after every ten experimental days. Laboratory test results conducted on the
soil samples at the end of the
40-day experimental period showed a general declined in the THC concentration.
It was observed that the THC concentration, in general, declined by about 90% in the remediated
contaminated soil samples, as against about 18.71% decline recorded in the
control. Furthermore, the contaminated
soil samples, with replacement amendments had better results after the
experimental period (40 days) with a mean value of 1196 mg kg-1 in THC residuum; when compared with
the results from the non-replacement amendments with a mean value of 3269 mg
kg-1 THC concentration
residual. These results show that charcoal blocks and sawdust significantly
degraded the THC concentration in the contaminated soil samples. Data obtained from this study
would provide useful information in the utilization of charcoal block and
sawdust in bioremediation techniques,
for the cleaning up of petroleum products/crude oil contaminated sites.
Keywords: Adsorption; Charcoal block; Remediation;
Sawdust; THC
Introduction
Soil is a loose and heterogeneous thin layer of organic and inorganic materials that covers a large
expanse of the earth’s surface.
Soil is mainly made of two constituents: namely the organic and inorganic parts. The organic
part is derived from the decayed
plants and animal materials, which is concentrated mostly in the topsoil. The inorganic part,
which consists of the subsoil
and rook fragments, was formed over thousands of years by physical, biological and/or chemical weathering
of the bedrock [1-3]. Soil
helps in the breakdown and immobilization of materials (fertilizers, chemicals, waste products,
etc.) added to its surface. The
soil is a complex environmental system, which employs (interactions) biological, chemical, and
physical processes, to degrade
harmful materials into less dangerous materials [4]. These interactions and the degradation
process may take a short duration
(few weeks), or a longer duration (years) to achieve its aim. Contaminants intentionally or unintentionally
discharged to the soil, mostly
the surface soil or of the topsoil is one of the greatest
environmental problems globally. This is because soils play a vital role in food production within
the ecosystem [4,5]. Soil
pollution is usually caused by the presence of synthesized chemicals or other alteration in the natural
soil environment. Soil
contamination typically occurs through the rupture of underground storage tanks, application of
pesticides, and the percolation
of contaminated surface water into subsurface strata, oil and fuel dumping, etc. [2].Oil exploration and exploitation in Nigeria
has taken an aggressively new
dimension in the last decade, with a more focus
on Northern and Central Nigeria (Lake Chad basin and Benue trough basin). According to the
Organization of Petroleum Exporting
Countries (OPEC), Nigeria’s oil and gas sector accounts for about 10 per cent of its gross domestic
product (GDP), while petroleum
exports revenue, accounts for about 86 per cent of Nigeria total exports
revenue [6]. Currently Nigeria has the largest
proven natural gas reserves (5,675 billion cu. m.) and the second largest proven crude oil reserves
(36,972 million barrels) in
Africa [6,7]. Crude oil spills are common occurrence in the oil rich Niger Delta region of
Nigeria. The Shell Petroleum Development
Company of Nigeria Limited (SPDC), the major oil exploring
company operating in Nigeria had attributed about 80% of oil spill incidence to crude oil theft
and sabotage of facilities, as well
as illegal refining activities [8]. The largest crude oil spill that had occurred in Nigerian history was the
SPDC Forcados Terminal tank
failure in 1978, which spilled out about 580,000 barrels of crude oil into the environment [9].
According to statistics from the International
Tanker Owners Pollution Federation (ITOPF), [10], a total volume of 1,000 tonnes of crude oil
was spilled into the environment
worldwide, which was the lowest annual spillage volume
recorded globally in the last five decades. Contamination of the soil and water bodies with either
crude oil or refined petroleum
products has had adverse effects on plants, animals, fishes and soil/water microorganisms [11].
According to Scott [12],
contamination of soil by petroleum/petroleum products can occurs through extraction, exploration and
processing accidents, spillages,
illegal refining methods, and indiscriminate disposal of the waste products [11].According to previous studies, there are
significant changes in the
soil’s physical characteristics, as well as chemical and microbiological properties after being
contaminated with crude oil or
petroleum products [3,12]. Akpomrere and Uguru [3] reported that the Lead (Pb), Nickel (Ni), Copper
(Cu), cadmium (Cd) and Iron
(Fe) concentrations in soil samples increased by over 100% after being contaminated with petroleum
products. Udonne and Onwuma [13]
observed that lubricating oil altered the soil bulk density from 1.10 to 1.15 gcm-3 and the soils capillarity from 8.10 to 0.04 cm h-1. Likewise, Akpokodje and Uguru [14],
reported that soil porosity
decreased from 35% to 14%, and specific gravity from
2.34 to 1.35; while the soil Cu concentration increased from 4.892 mg kg-1 to 7.729 mg kg-1, and Pb concentration from <0.0001 mg kg-1 to 1.128 mg kg-1 after soil samples were contaminated with petroleum products. Hydrocarbon pollutants
cause disruptions of the
natural equilibrium existing between the living things and their natural environment; and belong to the
family of carcinogens and
neurotoxic organic pollutants [15].Remediation
of crude oil or petroleum products contaminated polluted
soils is an important task to all oil exploring companies. Remediation of a polluted site can be
accomplished through physical, chemical,
thermal, and biological/natural methods. Remediation of petroleum polluted soils and water bodies
could be achieved by either
physical/mechanical (excavation, burning), chemical (detergent, surfactant, degreaser), plants
(phytoremediation) and biological
(bioremediation) methods [14,16]. Bioremediation is a technique that uses the microorganisms
(plants inclusive) to detoxify
or degrade contaminants from the environment; it is a remediation method that offers a green
technology solution to the problem
of environmental degradation [17]. Bioremediation relies on microbial enzymatic activities to degrade
contaminants from the ecosystem
[18]. Within the past two decades, many natural remediation
techniques have been developed by researchers to provide
more economical, effective and environmentally friendly methods of cleaning up polluted sites
[11,19].The use of plant-based
adsorbent in the cleaning-up of oil spill
areas has many advantages due to its simplicity of approach, cost-effectiveness, and biodegradable
nature, which leaves no permanent
residue [20]. Abioye et al., [21] reported that melon shells have the potential of degrading the
crude oil content in crude oil
contaminated soils by about 75% within a 28-day experimental
period. According to Aslam and Ayush [22], charcoal powder is an efficient adsorbent, absorbing
about 99 % crude oil from crude
oil contaminated seawater. Vasilyeva et al. [23] reported
that activated carbon is a good adsorbent for organic contaminants; probably due to its
hydrophobicity and micro-porous
structural makeup. According to Rhodes et al. [24], the biodegradation of phenanthrene in soil by
activated charcoal was highly
influenced by the quantity of the charcoal used during the remediation process, and the experimental
period. Likewise, Bushnaf et
al. [25] observed that biochar (2% concentration by weight) was able to increase the
biodegradation rate of polycyclic aromatic
hydrocarbon (PAHs) contaminants in the soils to a significant level.However, from the literature reviewed, there
was no evidence of the use of
wood charcoal block and sawdust amendment in remediating
petroleum products contaminated indigenous soils. Therefore, in this study, the bioremediation
potency of wood charcoal and
sawdust on petroleum products contaminated soils was
investigated. Likewise, the sorption potential of the charcoal blocks was measured. To the best of our
knowledge, this is the first extensive
research on bioremediation of petroleum products using replaceable combination of wood charcoal
blocks and sawdust.
Materials
and Methods Materials
Petroleum products
Spent motor engine oil was purchased from a motor mechanic workshop located at Ozoro, Delta State,
Nigeria; while the petrol, diesel
and kerosene were obtained from a filling station located at Ozoro, Delta State, Nigeria.
Wood charcoal blocks
The wood charcoal blocks were purchased from a located market located at Ozoro, Delta State,
Nigeria. Citing the International
Union of Pure and Applied Chemistry (IUPAC), wood
charcoal is the char obtained by the carbonization of wood (timber) [26,27].
Sawdust
Sawdust was obtained from a timber market located along Ozoro-Oleh road, Delta State, Nigeria. Dry
sawdust contains about 60%
carbon, 33% oxygen, and 1% nitrogen [28].
Topsoil
Topsoil used for this study was dug (0 - 15cm deep) from a corner of the research field station of
Delta State Polytechnic, Ozoro,
Nigeria.
Plant of interest
The bean (Phaseolus
vulgaris L) seeds were obtained
from the Department of
Agricultural and Bio-environmental Engineering Technology,
Delta State Polytechnic, Ozoro, Nigeria.
Methods and
samples preparation
Wood charcoal blocks and sawdust
The wood charcoal blocks, and sawdust were dried with an electric laboratory oven at a temperature of
1300C for 6h to reduce their
moisture content. Inactivated charcoal block was chosen over activated charcoal block because of its
relative availability, even though
the later may have a better efficiency; and also because the technology involved in the production of
activated charcoal, may not be
easily available to Nigerian local farmers.
Topsoil
Topsoil used for this study was air-dried under ambient atmospheric temperature (34±4oC)
for two weeks; after which it was
sieved with a 2mm gauge stainless steel sieve, to remove all stones and roots. 130kg of the sieved soil
was filled into a drum and
impacted with 5L of spent motor engine oil, 5L of kerosene, 5L of petrol and 5L of diesel and left to
stabilize for two weeks. At the
end of the two-week period, the contaminated soil was poured onto a concrete platform, wetted with
10L of borehole water and
thoroughly mixed together, and then left untouched for another 24h. The purpose of this procedure
is to simulate an oil spillage
situation; making sure that the petroleum products were uniformly distributed within the soil. Total
Hydrocarbon Content (THC)
concentration for all the soil samples (contaminated and uncontaminated) was determined in accordance
with the standard recommended
procedures as dictated by ASTM D. 9071B -7-.Experimental
design The thoroughly mixed
petroleum products contaminated soil was
filled into plastic buckets (7kg per bucket). The plastic buckets (perforated at the bottom) were arraigned in
five rows; with three buckets
per row and presented in the setups described below.
a) Row A
(first row): Contains no amendment
and was considered as the
control experiment; this row was coded “Control”.
b) Row B
(second row): 400g of the wood
charcoal block was inserted
into each of the buckets; this row was coded “Cb (N)”.
c) Row C
(third row): 400g of the wood
charcoal block was inserted
into each of the buckets, plus 100g of sawdust uniformly spread over the soil surface in the bucket;
this row was coded “Cb+Sd (N)”.
d) Row D
(fourth row): 400g of the wood
charcoal block was inserted
into each of the buckets; and replaced with fresh (new) ones after every ten experimental
days, this row was coded “Cb
(R)”.
e) Row E
(fifth row): 400g of the wood
charcoal block was inserted
into each of the buckets, plus 100 g of sawdust uniformly
spread over the soil surface in the bucket; both the charcoal and sawdust were replaced with
fresh ones after every ten
experimental days, this row was coded “Cb+Sd (R)”.
In summary, for rows B and C, the amendment(s) was/were left undisturbed throughout the experimental
period of 40 days; while for
rows D and E, the amendment(s) was/were replaced with
fresh ones after every ten experimental days. All the buckets were flooded with 2L of clean borehole
water, to enable floatation of
some of the oils in the contaminated soil. This act will boost the initial adsorption of the petroleum products
by the charcoal block and
sawdust spread on the soil in the buckets.
All the experimental setups (control and amended) were allowed for 10 days before the planting of
Honey bean (Phaseolus spp)
seeds. This window period (10 days) was adopted, to enable the charcoal block and sawdust remediate
(degrade) the heavy metals and
THC to a reasonable extent. Preliminary field test results showed that most of the bean seeds
planted directly into the soil
after contamination (i.e. on the first day of remediation) failed to germinate ten days after planting
(DAP).
Phytotoxicity test
The seed germination rate test of the contaminated soils was carried out in accordance with United
States Environmental Protection
Agency (US EPA 712-C-008) recommendations [29]. This
was done in order evaluate the effects of the mixture of petroleum products on the bean plants. Seven
healthy bean seeds were placed
evenly on top of the soil in each bucket, and were covered with 100g of uncontained fertile topsoil.
All the buckets were closely
monitored for ten days; and on a daily basis, each bucket was watered with 60 mL of clean
borehole water. The number of
bean seed(s) that germinated each day per bucket was and recorded till the 10th experimental day. Bean seed germination rate (SR) and Germination Index (GI) of the
soils samples were calculated
using Equation 1 and 2.
After the seed’s germination, the following morphological properties, leaves colour, leaves size and
plant height were closely monitored
for the remaining experimental days. The
study was conducted under ambient environmental conditions;
temperature was 34±4oC, average relative humidity was 69%, and no rainfall was recorded
throughout the experimental
period (December 2019 to January 2020). During the
experimental period the Honey bean plants were watered (manually) three times a week with 1L of
borehole water, to meet up with
the plant’s water requirement. The same volume of water (1L) was also poured onto the control unit.
Laboratory
tests
Soil heavy metals analysis Some
heavy metals (Nickel (Ni), Copper (Cu), Cadmium (Cd), Lead (Pb), and Iron (Fe)) concentrations in
the uncontaminated and
contaminated soil samples were analyzed. This was carried out to determine the concentrations of some
heavy metals present in the
soil samples in other to further characterize impacts on the soil and on the morphology of the bean
plants. All the parameters (heavy
metals) were determined by employing the standard recommended methods approved by American Public
Health Association [11,31].
Results of the soil analysis are presented in Table
1.
Table 1:
Heavy metals and THC concentrations of soil samples.
Determination of Total Hydrocarbon Content (THC) The THC of the soil samples was determined
by employing approved standards
recommended by ASTM D 9071B - 7, as described
by Akpan & Usuah [32]. Results of the soil THC analysis are presented in Table 1.
All the laboratory tests were carried out under ambient laboratory temperature. In addition, each
test was done in triplicate,
and the average value recorded. Percent
removal of THC
The percentage of THC adsorbed by the charcoal block during the experimental process was calculated by
using equation 1.12100 (1)1ccPercent removal
c−=×Where C1 = initial
THC concentration C2
= Final THC concentration
Statistical Analysis
All data gotten from this study were statistically analyzed
by employing the Statistical
Package for Social Statistics (SPSS version 20.0);
while the means were separated using The Duncan’s New Multiple Range (DNMR) Test (P ≤0.05). In
addition, the summary of the
readings was plotted with Microsoft Excel 2015.Results and
Discussion Laboratory
results of the heavy metals concentrations and THC
of the soil samples are presented in Table 1. The petroleum products have significant (p ≤0.05) effect
on the heavy metal concentration
and THC of all the soil samples, which is not contradictory
to previous research results of Ameh et al. [33], Akpan and Usuah [32], and Akpokodje et al.
[11]. The fairly appreciable concentration
of THC (40.56 mg/kg) observed in the
uncontaminated soil samples can be attributed to petroleum hydrocarbon contaminated atmospheric air;
impacted through oil
exploration, illegal crude oil refining, and traffic pollution [34]. Significant dose of petroleum
hydrocarbons pollutant in the
atmosphere will dissolve in the rainwater (since Delta State is a crude oil production hub in Nigeria),
which will precipitate down
during the rainy season (April to October) and subsequently infiltrate into the soil. Likewise, the area
where the topsoil was collected
is prone to flooding; therefore, there is a high probability that significant amounts of contaminants
(hydrocarbons) will flow along
with the floodwater and infiltrate into the soil.
Values are mean ±
standard deviation; Rows with the same common
letter (superscript) are not significantly different at (p ≤0.05).
Morphological
performance of the Honey bean plant
The experimental set up for morphological analysis of the honey bean plants cultivated is shown in
Figures 1 & 2. The bean plants
growing in setups with replacement amendments (wood charcoal blocks and sawdust) performed
better, when compared to those
growing in setups with non-replacement amendments. In contrast, the few bean seeds that germinated
in the un-amended soils samples
died within two weeks after germination (Figure 3).
This could be attributed to the heavy metals and petroleum hydrocarbons toxicity. According to Ahsan et
al. [35] and [8], heavy metals
and petroleum hydrocarbons are highly poisonous to
plants and can lead to their dead if present in the soil in high quantity.
Figure 1: Honey bean growing in replacement amendment.
Figure 2: Honey bean growing in non-replacement amendment.
Figure 3: Bioremediation of contaminated soil using wood charcoal and sawdust amendment.
Figure 4: Effect of experimental duration on the THC removal efficiency of charcoal block.
The remediated soil samples, with replacement amendment(s) had better results after the experimental
period (40 days), with a mean
THC residual value of 1196 mg/kg; when compared with the mean results (3269 mg/kg) obtained from the
setups with non-replacement
amendment(s). Figure 4 shows the effect of contact duration on the removal efficiency by the
charcoal blocks during the
experimental process. With reference to the non-replacement amendments, the THC removal efficiency by the
charcoal blocks was higher
(48.1%) at the initial stage of the experiment (between Day 0 and Day 20), when compared to the
removal efficiency value (6.36%)
recorded during the later stage of the experiment (between Day 20 and Day 40). Additionally, Figure 5
further conform the effect of
contact duration on the adsorption of THC from the contaminated soil samples. While a decline
in the accumulated THC
concentration adsorbed was observed in the non-replacement charcoal blocks after 20 days; a further
increment was observed
(after the same period) in the accumulative THC concentration for the replacement setup employing charcoal blocks. This portrayed that after a charcoal block had attained its adsorption climax, it will lose its adsorption efficiency; and if possible, some of the already absorbed contaminants (THC) could leak back into the soil. Similar trend was observed by Edokpayi et al. [41]. Edokpayi et al. [42] observed that the adsorption efficiency of coconut shell-based adsorbent increased drastically (6% to 35%) as the contact time increased from 20 min to 60 min, after which it slowed down (35% to 40%) between 60 min to 100 min contact time, before it started to decline after 100 min. According to Abu Bakar et al. [42], the higher adsorption efficiency (fast kinetics) detected during the initial contact time could be credited to the abundant availability of active binding sites within the adsorbent material, which are later filled up as the adsorption process progresses.
Figure 5: Amount of THC adsorbed by charcoal block during the experimental period.
Since charcoal is not a selective adsorbent material; it will therefore absorb not only the harmful contaminants, but also the useful nutrients (and trace elements) required by the plant’s growth and microbial activity within the soil. Good soil microbial activity is an indicator of good soil quality as it encourages soil microorganisms’ performance. Plants rely heavily on soil microorganisms to mineralize organic nutrients for their growth and development [43]. Therefore, the charcoal quantity (concentration) used for bioremediation needs to be monitored (controlled) during the bioremediation process. Some researchers had provided some information on the importance of absorbent materials quantity regulations in earlier studies. Cheng et al. [44] observed a rapid biodegradation of nonylphenol (petroleum compound) as the concentration of rice straw biochar was increased to an optimal point; after which, further increment in the rice straw biochar concentration negatively affected the microbial activities in the soil. Cornelissen et al. [45] and Ghosh et al. [46] reported that increasing the concentration of carbonaceous materials (activated carbon, charcoal, biochar, etc.) could lead to a decline in microbial activities (biodegradation) due to reduction in bioaccessibility and bioavailability. Rhodes et al. [24] observed that activated carbon concentration, if not controlled, can reduced the biodegradation process in the soil; this it does due to its’ strong sorptive capacity and ability to increase the very slowly desorbing fractions, which leads to reduce contaminant availability [46]. According to Cheng et al. [44], biochar did not only degrade contaminants in the soils but also affects metabolite rate. The above-mentioned reasons showed the advantage of charcoal block over biochar or granular (powder) charcoal; this is because, charcoal blocks can be easily retrieved (removed) from the remediating soil if an overreaction (abnormal sorptive capacity) is observed.Materials recovered from the replacement amendment can be recycled for further use. For instance, the replaced will sawdust contains significant amount of petroleum hydrocarbons; therefore, they can be used to produce insects’ resistant plyboards. Petroleum based oils have been used as effective pesticides for centuries and have advantages over other artificial pesticides because they have; very low mammalian toxicity, low residual activity, and are less disruptive to natural enemies when compared to a broad spectrum of other insecticides [47-49]. Citing Carlos et al. [50] petroleum-based oils are effective and safe alternatives as insecticides and fungicides when compared to synthesized insecticides. Some important oils distilled from crude oil include paraffin, kerosene, etc. They can be used to manage pests and diseases.Conclusion This study was carried out to investigate the effect of wood charcoal block and sawdust on THC biodegradation, in petroleum products contaminated soil samples. Laboratory results obtained from the experiment showed that a combination of charcoal block and sawdust, significantly biodegraded the THC concentration of the soil samples. Although the THC concentration of all the soil samples (both the amended and the control) generally declined during the experimental period; THC removal was higher (between 60% and 90%) in the amended contaminated soil samples, when compared to results (18.71%) obtained from the control soil samples. In all cases, it can be seen from the results that replacing the amendments every 10 experimental days significantly influenced biodegradation of the THC in the contaminated soil samples. This study indicated that there was an optimal charcoal THC adsorption efficiency in relation to the contact duration with the contaminated soil after, which adsorption efficiency of the charcoal block declined with time. Furthermore, the amendment affected the morphological performance of the honey bean plants growing in the contaminated soil samples. The results obtained from this study will provide useful information in the utilization of charcoal block and sawdust in bioremediation technique, for the cleaning up of petroleum products/crude oil contaminated sites. In addition, more research needs to also focus on the recycling and utilization of the high concentration THC wood charcoal blocks and sawdust products.
To Know More About Trends in Technical and ScientificResearch Please click on:
https://juniperpublishers.com/ttsr/index.php
To Know More About Open Access Journals Please click on:
https://juniperpublishers.com/index.php
Comments
Post a Comment